Развитие перкутанных методов операций для лечения пациентов с конкрементами почек. Обзор.
Abstract
Работа основана на анализе литературных данных, посвященных проблеме выбора современного малоинвазивного оперативного доступа в лечении уролитиаза почек, за последние 10 лет. Основная цель данного обзора – выявить ключевые этапы эволюции хирургического подхода к лечению пациентов с мочекаменной болезнью, а также определить среди существующих перкутанных оперативных доступов к почке наиболее перспективные. Главная идея, которая является в настоящий момент определяющим вектором в поиске методик лечения данной патологии – это определить эффективность и безопасность использования современных способов доступа и проведения перкутанной нефролитолапаксии, в различных условиях, в том числе без возможности интраоперационного рентгенологического контроля.
About the Authors
Дмитрий АбрамовRussian Federation
Андрей Строганов
Russian Federation
Вагиф Атдуев
Russian Federation
References
1. Gadzhiev N. K., Grigoriev V. E., Mazurenko D. A., Malkhasyan V. A., Obidnyak V. M., Pisarev A.V., Tagirov N. S., Popov S. V., Petrov S. B. Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in complex forms of kidney stones: structural biomodeling. Experimental and clinical urology. 2016. 3. pp. 46-51.
2. Rogachikov V. V., Nesterov S. N., Ilchenko D. N., Tevlin K. P., Kudryashov A.V. Percutaneous nephrolitolapaxia: past, present, future. Experimental and clinical urology. 2016. 2. C. 24-28.
3. Aminsharifi A., Irani D., Masoumi M., Goshtasbi B., Aminsharifi A., Mohamadian R. The management of large staghorn renal stones by percutaneous versus laparoscopic versus open nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis of clinical efficacy and functional outcome. Urolithiasis. 2016. 44 (6). P. 551-557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-016-0877-6.
4. Assimos D., Krambeck A., Miller N.L., Monga M., Murad M.H., Nelson C.P., Pace K.T., Jr1Pais V.M., Pearle M.S., Preminger G.M., Razvi H., Shah O., Matlaga B.R. Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association Endourological Society Guideline, part I. J. Urol. 2016. 196 (4). P. 1153-1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090.
5. Desai M., Sun Y., Buchholz N., Fuller A., Matsuda T., Matlaga B., Miller N., Bolton D., Alomar M., Ganpule A. Treatment selection for urolithiasis. – percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring. World J. Urol. 2017. 35(9). P. 1395-1399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2030-8.
6. Donaldson J.F., Lardas M., Scrimgeour D., Stewart F., MacLennan S., Lam T.B., McClinton S. Systematic review and meta–analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower–pole renal stones. Eur. Urol. 2015. 67 (4). P. 612-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.054.
7. Gorbachinsky I., Wood K., Colaco M., Hemal S., Mettu J., Mirzazadeh M., Assimos D.G., Gutierrez-Aćeves J. Evaluation of Renal Function after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy–Does the Number of Percutaneous Access Tracts Matter? J. Urol. 2016. 196 (1). P.131-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.121.
8. Rizvi S.A.H., Hussain M., Askari S.H., Hashmi A., Lal M., Zafar M.N. Surgical outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 3402 patients and results of stone analysis in 1559 patients. BJU Int. 2017. 120 (5). P. 703-709. https://doi.org/
9. Kallidonis P., Panagopoulos V., Kyriazis I., Liatsikos E. Complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: classification, management, and prevention. Curr. Opin. Urol. 2016. 26(1). P. 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000232.
10. Tailly T., Denstedt J. Innovations in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int. J. Surg. 2016. 36 (Pt D). p. 665-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.007.
11. Wang Y. , Hou Y., Jiang F., Wang Y., Chen Q., Lu Z., Hu J., Wang X., Lu J., Wang C. Standard–tract combined with mini–tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal staghorn calculi. Urol. Int. 2014. 92 (4). P. 422-426. https://doi.org/10.1159/000354427.
12. Pisanenko D. N., Hartlieb E. V., Gorshkova T. N., Ivaneeva M. V., Galician T. V., Abramov D. V., Danilov A. A., Ruina, O. V., Stroganov A. B., Atdheu V. A. Microbiological analysis as an effective tool for the optimization of starting empirical antibiotic therapy in urological clinic. Urology. 2018. 6. pp. 45-51.
13. Proietti S., Giusti G., Desai M., Ganpule A.P. A critical review of miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is smaller better? Eur. Urol. Focus. 2017. 3 (1). R. 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2017.05.001.
14. Rivera M., Viers, B., Cockerill, P., D. Agarwal, R. Mehta, A. Krambeck Pre - and postoperative predictors of infection–related complications in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J. Endourol. 2016. 30(9). P. 982-986. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0191.
15. Gorgotsky I. A., Shkarupa D. D., Shkarupa A. G., Yarova N. P., Kubin N. D., Petrov A.D. Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in infected urine: crushing cannot be drained. Experimental and clinical urology. 2018. 4. pp. 48-53.
16. Dulepova A. A., Pozdeyeva T. V., Stroganov A. B., Pisanenko D. V., Khazov M. V. Internal quality control as a tool for improving the quality of medical care for urological patients. Medical almanac. 2018. 3 (54). pp. 15-19.
17. Malkhasyan V. A., Semenyakin I. V., Ivanov V. Yu., Sukhoi S. O., Gadzhiev N. K. Review of complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and methods of their treatment. Urology. 2018. 4. pp. 147-153.
18. Perepanova T. S., Radjabov U. A., Golovanov S. A., Merinov D. S.,
19. Arustamov L. D. Antimicrobial prevention of infectious kidney stones after percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. RMZH. 2017. 27 (25). pp. 1987-1991.
20. Bansal S.S., Pawar P.W., Sawant A.S., Tamhankar A.S., Patil S.R., Kasat G.V. Predictive factors for fever and sepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A review of 580 patients. Urol. Ann. 2017. 9(3). P. 230-233. https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_166_16.
21. Gutierrez J., Smith A., Geavleteetal P. Urinary tract infections and post–operative fever in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World Journal of Urology. 2013. 31(5). P. 1135-1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0836-y.
22. Kreydin E.I., Eisner B.H. Risk factors for sepsis after percutaneous renal stone surgery. Nature Reviews Urology. 2013. 10 (10). P. 598-605. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2013.183
23. Ferraro P.M., Taylor E.N., Gambaro G., Curhan G.C. Dietary and lifestyle risk factors associated with incident kidney stones in men and women. J. Urol. 2017. 198(4). P. 858-863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.124.
24. Sorokin I., Mamoulakis C., Miyazawa K., Rodgers A., Talati J., Lotan Y. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J. Urol. 2017. 35 (9). P. 1301-1320.
25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6
26. Apolikhin O. I., Sivkov A.V., Komarova V. A., Prosyannikov M. Yu., Golovanov S. A., Kazachenko A.V., Nikushina A. A., Shaderkina V. A. Incidence of urolithiasis in the Russian Federation
27. (2005-2016). Experimental and clinical urology. 2018. 4. pp. 4-14.
28. Gadzhiev N. K., Brovkin S. S., Grigoriev V. E., Dmitriev V. V., Malkhasyan V. A., Shkarupa D. D., Pisarev A.V., Mazurenko D. A., Obidnyak V. M., Orlov I. N., Popov S. V., Tagirov N. S., Petrov S. V. Metaphylaxis of urolithiasis: a new look, a modern approach, mobile implementation. Urology. 2017. 1. pp. 124-129. https://doi.org/10.17816/PED7384-91.
29. Lojanapiwat B., Rod–Ong P., Kitirattrakarn P., Chongruksut W. Guy's Stone Score (GSS) based on intravenous pyelogram (IVP) findings predicting upper pole access percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) outcomes. Adv. Urol. 2016. P. 5157930. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5157930.
30. Brikowski T.H., Lotan Y., Pearle M.S. Climate–related increase in the prevalence of urolithiasis in the United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008. 105 (28). P. 9841-9846. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709652105.
31. Kamphuis G.M., Baard J., Westendarp M., de la Rosette J.J. Lessons learned from the CROES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study. World J. Urol. 2015. 33(2). P. 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1367-5.
32. Keoghane S.R., Cetti R.J., Rogers A.E., Walmsley B.H. Blood transfusion, embolisation and nephrectomy after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). BJU Int. 2013. 111(4). P. 628-632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11394.x.
33. Leow J.J., Meyer C.P., Wang Y., Chang S.L., Chung B.I., Trinh Q.D., Korets R., Bhojani N. Contemporary trends in utilization and perioperative outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the United States from 2003 to 2014. J. Endourol. 2017. 31(8). P. 742-750. https://doi.org/ 10.1089/end.2017.0225.
34. Rizvi S.A.H., Hussain M., Askari S.H., Hashmi A., Lal M., Zafar M.N. Surgical outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 3402 patients and results of stone analysis in 1559 patients. BJU Int. 2017. 120 (5). P. 703-709. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13848.
35. Garofalo M., Pultrone C.V., Schiavina R., Brunocilla E., Sanguedolce F., Borghesi M., Rocca C., Del Prete C., Morselli-Labate A.M., Paccapelo A., Martorana G. Tubeless procedure reduces hospitalization and pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: results of a multivariable analysis. Urolithiasis. 2013. 41 (4). P. 347-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0565-8.
36. Kireev D. A., Pisanenko D. V., Danilov A. A., Abramov D. V., Khazov M. V., Romanov S. V., Ruina O. V., Stroganov A. B. The significance of microbiological analysis for rational antibacterial therapy in the urological department of a high-tech medical care hospital. Practical medicine. 2014. 3 (79). pp. 98-102.
37. Cormio L., Preminger G., Saussine C., Buchholz N.P., Zhang X., Walfridsson H., Gross A.J., de la Rosette J. Nephrostomy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): does nephrostomy tube size matter? Results from the Global PCNL Study from the Clinical Research Office Endourology Society. World J. Urol. 2013. 31 (6). P.1563-1568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0969-z.
38. Isac W., Rizkala E., Liu X., Monga M. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: outcomes with expanded indications. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2014. 40 (2). P. 204-211. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.02.10.
39. Merinov D. S., Artemov A.V., Epishov V. A., Arustamov L. D., Gurbanov Sh. Sh., Polikarpova A.M. Multicutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of coralloid kidney stones. Urology. 2018. 4. pp. 96-101. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/urology.2018.4.96-101
40. Ren Y. M., Wu X. M., Wen Y., Lai Q., Chen W. Z., Qian Y. X., Liang R. G. Recurrent bleeding following the renal artery embolization treating post–percutaneous nephrolithotomy hemorrhage: causes and countermeasures. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017. 97 (1). P. 22-25. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.01.006.
41. Un S., Cakir V., Kara C., Turk H. Risk factors for hemorrhage requiring embolization after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Can. Ural. Assoc. J. 2015. 9 (9-10). P. 594-598.
42. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.2803
43. Kogan M. I., Akilov F. A., Martov A. G., Dutov V. V., Grigoriev N. A. Innovative surgery of kidney stones and ureters. Moscow: Medcongress. 2021. 344 p.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
, , . Surgical practice (Russia). 2016;(1).
Email this article 
