Endoscopic semiotics and diagnostics of rectal neuroendocrine tumors
https://doi.org/10.5922/2223-2427-2025-10-1-1
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the role of endoscopic techniques in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum, as well as to determine the features and symptoms characteristic of these tumors.
Methods. An analysis of patients diagnosed with R-NETs examined at the N.N. Blokhin NationalMedical Research Center of Oncology over the past year and a half was conducted. The followingdata were established: the average size of the formations, their most common localization, theaverage proliferation index and the preferred method of treatment.
Results. The average follow-up period was 25 months. The median age was 47,5 years. All patientsunderwent colonoscopy using clarifying diagnostic techniques. In 57% of cases, tumors were localized in the middle ampullary section of the rectum, in 32% in the lower ampullary section, andin 11% in the upper ampullary section. The average size of the formations was 9 mm.According tothe results of histological examination, type 1 according to the WHO classification was identified in73% of cases, and type 2 in 27% of cases. All patients underwent surgical treatment. There wereno signs of disease progression at the time of evaluation of the results.
Conclusion. According to the latest data, there is currently no single tactic for managing patients with neuroendocrine tumors, and the existing diagnostic and treatment plan is a multidisciplinary comprehensive approach. The choice of an adequate volume of surgical intervention depends on the correct endoscopic assessment of the tumor, which allows suspecting the neuroendocrine nature of the formation before its removal. The widespread introduction of colonoscopy as a screening method allows increasing the detection rate of such rare formations as neuroendocrine tumors of the colon, as well as increasing the awareness of endoscopists in recognizing neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum.
About the Authors
A. S. VishnevskiiRussian Federation
Alexander S. Vishnevskii – Endoscopist
Kashirskoye highway, 24, Moscow, 115522
I. A. Karasev
Russian Federation
Ivan A. Karasev – Associate professor, Senior researcher, Head of the Endoscopic department
Kashirskoye highway, 24, Moscow, 115522
T. S. Davydkina
Russian Federation
Tatiana S. Davydkina – Endoscopist
Kashirskoye highway, 24, Moscow, 115522
M. A. Krylovetskaya
Russian Federation
Maria A. Krylovetskaya – Associate professor
Kashirskoye highway, 24, Moscow, 115522
I. G. Komarov
Russian Federation
Igor G. Komarov – Professor, Leading Researcher
Kashirskoye highway, 24, Moscow, 115522
References
1. Lawrence B, Gustafsson BI, Chan A, Svejda B, Kidd M, Modlin IM. The epidemiology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2011;40(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2010.12.005
2. Huguet I, Grossman AB, O’Toole D. Changes in the Epidemiology of Neuroendocrine Tumours. Neuroendocrinology. 2017;104(2):105-111. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441897
3. Mamedov I.Ya., Feydorov I.Yu. Epidemiology of neuroendocrine tumors on the example of the registry of the Moscow Clinical Research Center named after A.S. Loginov. Endocrine Surgery. 2023;17(4):56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/serg12879
4. Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D, Zhao B, Zhou S, Xu Y, Shih T, Yao JC. Trends in the Incidence, Prevalence, and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;3(10):1335-1342. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0589
5. Ellis L, Shale MJ, Coleman MP. Carcinoid tumors of the gastrointestinal tract: trends in incidence in England since 1971. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Dec;105(12):2563-9. Epub 2010 Sep 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2010.341.
6. Hauso O, Gustafsson BI, Kidd M, Waldum HL, Drozdov I, Chan AK, Modlin IM. Neuroendocrine tumor epidemiology: contrasting Norway and North America. Cancer. 2008 Nov 15;113(10):2655-64. PMID: 18853416. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23883
7. Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, Dagohoy C, Leary C, Mares JE, Abdalla EK, Fleming JB, Vauthey JN, Rashid A, Evans DB. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jun 20;26(18):3063-72. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4377
8. Kwaan M R, Goldberg J E, Bleday R. Rectal carcinoid tumors: review of results after endoscopic and surgical therapy. Arch Surg. 2008;143(5):471–475. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.143.5.471
9. Cope J, Srirajaskanthan R. Rectal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Why Is There a Global Variation? Curr Oncol Rep. 2022 Mar;24(3):257-263. Epub 2022 Jan 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-021-01172-1
10. Basuroy R, Haji A, Ramage JK, Quaglia A, Srirajaskanthan R. Review article: the investigation and management of rectal neuroendocrine tumours. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;44(4):332–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13697
11. Hallet J, Law CHL, Cukier M, Saskin R, Liu N, Singh S. Exploring the rising incidence of neuroendocrine tumors: a population-based analysis of epidemiology, metastatic presentation, and outcomes. Cancer. 2015;121(4):589–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29099
Review
For citations:
Vishnevskii A.S., Karasev I.A., Davydkina T.S., Krylovetskaya M.A., Komarov I.G. Endoscopic semiotics and diagnostics of rectal neuroendocrine tumors. Surgical practice (Russia). 2025;(1):3-11. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5922/2223-2427-2025-10-1-1