Adaptation of the FIQL Questionnaire for Patients with Anal Incontinence
https://doi.org/10.5922/2223-2427-2024-9-2-2
- Р Р‡.МессенРТвЂВВВВВВВВжер
- РћРТвЂВВВВВВВВнокласснРСвЂВВВВВВВВРєРСвЂВВВВВВВВ
- LiveJournal
- Telegram
- ВКонтакте
- РЎРєРѕРїРСвЂВВВВВВВВровать ссылку
Full Text:
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of the cultural and linguistic adaptation of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQOL) for the Russian-speaking population.
Methods: A cultural and linguistic adaptation of the FIQL questionnaire was performed in accordance with international guidelines. This process included several key steps: professional translation of the questionnaire, back translation, and critical discussion within an interdisciplinary council comprising translators, linguists, psychologists, doctors, and patients. Preliminary testing and reliability assessment were also conducted. The results of the preliminary testing are presented in this article. A total of 26 patients who had undergone surgical treatment for anal incontinence (sphincterolevatoroplasty) between 2016 and 2022 participated in the preliminary testing phase.
Results. The result of the cultural adaptation is the Russian language version of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQOL), which has undergone all the aforementioned stages with corrections and comments in the order of the council of doctor-translator-psychologist-patient. The average time elapsed from the moment of surgery to the survey was 32 months (SD = 20). The average overall score of the questionnaire was 3.2 (SD = 0.62), the average score on the ‘Lifestyle’ scale was 3.3 (SD = 0.74), the average score on the ‘Behaviour, daily worries’ scale was 3.2 (SD = 0.65), the average score on the ‘Depression and self-perception scale was 3.4 (SD = 0.91) and the average score on the ‘Shame’ scale was 3.2 (SD = 0.71). The assessment of the reliability of the questionnaire, as shown by the alpha-Kronbach coefficient, was 0.94, which corresponds to the assessment of ‘very good reliability’.
Conclusion. The presented data show that the Russian version of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQOL) is adapted for use by Russian-speaking patients and specialists, is reliable, and can be used as a primary tool for assessing the quality of life of patients with anal incontinence.
About the Authors
D. R. MarkaryanRussian Federation
Daniil R. Markaryan, Associate Professor, Department of Surgery of the Faculty of Medicine
1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991
A. M. Lukianov
Russian Federation
Alexander M. Lukianov, PhD Student, Department of Surgery of the Faculty of Medicine
1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991
T. N. Garmanova
Russian Federation
Tatiana N. Garmanova, Associate Professor, Department of Surgery of the Faculty of Medicine
1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991
E. A. Kazachenko
Russian Federation
Ekaterina A. Kazachenko, PhD Student, Department of Surgery of the Faculty of Medicine
1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991
V. A. Kubyshkin
Russian Federation
Valery A. Kubyshkin, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the Department of Surgery of the Faculty of Medicine
1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991
References
1. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC. Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Jan;43(1):9-16; discussion 16-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237236
2. Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C. A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/ Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003 Aug;14(3):164-8; discussion 168. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00192-003-1063-2
3. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Jan;36(1):77-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050307
4. Peterson AC, Sutherland JM, Liu G, Crump RT, Karimuddin AA. Evaluation of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL) using item response theory reveals limitations and suggests revisions. Qual Life Res. 2018 Jun;27(6):1613-1623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1826-3
5. Duelund-Jakobsen J, Buntzen S, Lundby L, Laurberg S, Sørensen M, Rydningen M. One-stage implant in sacral neuromodulation for faecal incontinence - short-term outcome from a prospective study. Colorectal Dis. 2024 Mar 11. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16936
6. Gachabayov M, Angelos G, Orangio G, Abcarian H, Bergamaschi R; Hemorrhoids Study Group. Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization With Mucopexy Versus Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy for Prolapsed Internal Hemorrhoids: A Multicenter Prospective Study. Ann Surg. 2023 Sep 1;278(3):376-382. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005961
7. Bharucha AE, Gantz MG, Rao SS, Lowry AC, Chua H, Karunaratne T, Wu J, Hamilton FA, Whitehead WE. Comparative effectiveness of biofeedback and injectable bulking agents for treatment of fecal incontinence: Design and methods. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;107:106464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2021.106464
8. ‘t Hoen LA, Utomo E, Schouten WR, Blok BF, Korfage IJ. The fecal incontinence quality of life scale (FIQL) and fecal incontinence severity index (FISI): Validation of the Dutch versions. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Mar;36(3):710-715. https://doi.org/10.1002/NAU.23003
9. Dehli T, Martinussen M, Mevik K, Stordahl A, Sahlin Y, Lindsetmo RO, Vonen B. Translation and validation of the Norwegian version of the fecal incontinence quality-of-life scale. Scand J Surg. 2011;100(3):190- 5. https://doi.org/10.1177/145749691110000310
10. Mak TW, Leung WW, Ngo DK, Lee JF, Hon SS, Ng SS. Translation and validation of the traditional Chinese version of the faecal incontinence quality of life scale. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Feb;31(2):445-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2462-9
11. Himmler M, Mühlbauer J, Schwarzer N, Stein R, Younsi N. Urinary and Fecal Continence in Adolescent and Adult Patients With Cloacal Exstrophy. Urology. 2022 Jun;164:293-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.01.009
12. Minguez M, Garrigues V, Soria MJ, Andreu M, Mearin F, Clave P. Adaptation to Spanish language and validation of the fecal incontinence quality of life scale. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Apr;49(4):490-9. https:// https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1007/S10350-006-0514-5
13. Dedeli O, Fadiloglu C, Bor S. Validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009 Sep-Oct;36(5):532-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0B013E3181B36010
14. Hsu LF, Hung CL, Kuo LJ, Tsai PS. An abbreviated Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale for Chinese-speaking population with colorectal cancer after surgery: cultural adaptation and item reduction. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Sep;26(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/ECC.12547
15. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Dec;46(12):1417-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N
16. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
17. Suponeva NA, Piradov MA, Ryabinkina YuV, Yusupova DG, Zimin AA, Kirichenko OA, Buzgan NG, Yatsko KA, Sergeev DV, Zaytsev AB, Legostayeva LA, Yazeva EG, Shcherbakova ES, Bundhun P, Ramchandani NM, Pistoia F. Comorbidities Coma Scale (CoCoS): Linguistic and Cultural Adaptation of the Russian-Language Version. General Reanimatology. 2022;18(2):65-75 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2022-2-65-75;.
18. Boldori HM, Ciconet RM, Viegas K, Schaefer R, Santos MND. Cross-cultural adaptation of the scale National Emergency Department Overcrowding Score (NEDOCS) for use in Brazil. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2021 May 21;42:e20200185. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2021.20200185
19. Coenen P, Zegers AD, Stapelfeldt CM, de Maaker-Berkhof M, Abma F, van der Beek AJ, Bültmann U, Duijts SFA. Cross-cultural translation and adaptation of the Readiness for Return To Work questionnaire for Dutch cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Mar;30(2):e13383. https://doi.org/10.1111/ECC.13383.
20. León-Salas B, Bilbao-González A, de Pascual Y Medina AM, Esteva M, Toledo-Chávarri A, Fuentes-Sánchez C, Bohn-Sarmiento U, Padrón-Peña P, González-Sánchez S, Valcárcel-López R, Trujillo-Martín MDM. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the long-term quality of life questionnaire. Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 19;14:1375125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1375125
21. Del Greco L, Walop W, Eastridge L. Questionnaire development: 3. Translation. CMAJ. 1987 Apr 15;136(8):817-8.
Review
For citations:
Markaryan D.R., Lukianov A.M., Garmanova T.N., Kazachenko E.A., Kubyshkin V.A. Adaptation of the FIQL Questionnaire for Patients with Anal Incontinence. Surgical practice (Russia). 2024;(2):22-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5922/2223-2427-2024-9-2-2