INTRAOPERATIVE MALFUNCTIONS OF STAPLER DEVICES. THE CURRENT STATE OF THE PROBLEM AND A SERIES OF CLINICAL CASES
https://doi.org/10.38181/2223-2427-2022-3-5-11
Abstract
The paper presents several medical device reports from our center identified during application of surgical staplers from different manufacturers. The revealed malfunction did not lead to postoperative complications, however, they affected the duration of the operation and the cost of treatment. Failure of the stapler devices during surgery in the absence of proper attention to the staple line can lead to an increase in the frequency of postoperative complications. It remains unclear the problem of «small» malfunctions of stapler devices, which may go unnoticed during surgery, but affect the outcomes of treatment of patients. In order to identify a possible association between these adverse events and postoperative complications, it is necessary to form a state register of events associated with the use of stapler devices.
About the Authors
M. A. AgapovRussian Federation
Mikhail A. Agapov – PhD, Professor of the Department of Surgery, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Department of Surgery № 1 of the Medical Research Educational Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Lomonosovsky Prospect, 27/10, Moscow, 119192
Phone: +7-495-003-13-82
V. V. Kakotkin
Russian Federation
Viktor V. Kakotkin – Surgeon of the Department of Surgery № 1 of the Medical Research Educational Center
Leninskie Gory St., 1, 119991, Moscow
D. R. Markaryan
Russian Federation
Daniil R. Markaryan – PhD, docent of the Department of Surgery
Leninskie Gory St., 1, 119991, Moscow
T. N. Garmanova
Russian Federation
Tatyana N. Garmanova – PhD, docent of the Department of Surgery
Leninskie Gory St., 1, 119991, Moscow
References
1. Gaidry AD, Tremblay L, Nakayama D, Ignacio RC Jr. The History of Surgical Staplers: A Combination of Hungarian, Russian, and American Innovation. Am Surg. 2019 Jun 1;85(6):563-566.
2. Kyzer S, Gordon PH. Experience with the use of the circular stapler in rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992 Jul;35(7):696-706.
3. Demertzis S, Beslac O, Mettler D, Zalokar D, Spangler T, Hausen B, Swanstrom L. Beyond the "B": a new concept of the surgical staple enabling miniature staplers. Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3674-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4125-x
4. Choy PY, Bissett IP, Docherty JG, Parry BR, Merrie A, Fitzgerald A. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;(9):CD004320. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004320.pub3
5. Luglio G, Corcione F. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Nov;23(11):1093-1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02105-8
6. Nordholm-Carstensen A, Schnack Rasmussen M, Krarup PM. Increased Leak Rates Following Stapled Versus Handsewn Ileocolic Anastomosis in Patients with Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 May;62(5):542-548. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001289
7. Polglase AL, Winnett JD. Check the stapler before use. Aust N Z J Surg. 1999 May;69(5):402-3. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01586.x
8. Deng DY, Meng MV, Nguyen HT, Bellman GC, Stoller ML. Laparoscopic linear cutting stapler failure. Urology. 2002 Sep;60(3):415-9; discussion 419-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01778-8
9. Brown SL, Woo EK. Surgical stapler-associated fatalities and adverse events reported to the Food and Drug Administration. J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Sep;199(3):374-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.264
10. Maisel W. Safe use of surgical staplers and staples — letter to health care providers. https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/LetterstoHealthCareProviders/ucm632938.html. Доступ от 18.08.2022.
11. Benham DA, Calvo RY, Carr MJ, Diaz JA, Sise CB, Sise MJ, Bansal V, Martin MJ. Revealing the scope of surgical device malfunctions: Analysis of the "hidden" Food and Drug Administration device database. Am J Surg. 2021 Jun;221(6):1121-1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.017
12. Makanyengo SO, Thiruchelvam D. Literature Review on the Incidence of Primary Stapler Malfunction. Surg Innov. 2020 Apr;27(2):229-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350619889274
13. Clapp B, Schrodt A, Ahmad M, Wicker E, Sharma N, Vivar A, Davis B. Stapler Malfunctions in Bariatric Surgery: An Analysis of the MAUDE Database. JSLS. 2022 Jan-Mar;26(1):e2021.00074. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00074
14. Galliamov ÉA, Agapov MA, Donchenko KA, Galliamov EE, Kakotkin VV. Comparison of efficiency and safety of laparoscopic manual esophagoenterostomy and esophagoenterostomy with mechanical anastomotic devices aſter laparoscopic gastrectomy for stomach cancer. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery = Khirurgiya. Zurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2020;(4):11-17. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202004111
15. Galliamov EA, Agapov MA, Lutsevich O, Kubyshkin VA, Kakotkin VV, Tolstykh MP. Early ileostomy closure in patients with rectal cancer. Primary results of the randomized controlled multicenter trial. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery = Khirurgiya. Zurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2019;(6):35-40. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia201906135
16. Offodile AC 2nd, Feingold DL, Nasar A, Whelan RL, Arnell TD. High incidence of technical errors involving the EEA circular stapler: a single institution experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Mar;210(3):331-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.11.007
17. Perinjelil V, Nkansah-Amankra K, Maraqa T, Mercer L, Sachwani-Daswani G. Endo GIA stapler malfunction in a small bowel loop resection. J Surg Case Rep. 2018 Oct 26;2018(10):rjy281. https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjy281
Review
For citations:
Agapov M.A., Kakotkin V.V., Markaryan D.R., Garmanova T.N. INTRAOPERATIVE MALFUNCTIONS OF STAPLER DEVICES. THE CURRENT STATE OF THE PROBLEM AND A SERIES OF CLINICAL CASES. Surgical practice (Russia). 2022;(3):5-11. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38181/2223-2427-2022-3-5-11