THE FEATURES OF PRETERM PERIOD AND DELIVERY IN PPATIENTS WITH BENIGN OVARIAN NEOPLASMS
https://doi.org/10.38181/2223-2427-2020-1-64-71
Abstract
Abstract: Nowadays medical society is facing increasing numbers of adnexal masses in women of reproductive age, and especially challenging for the diagnostic workup and management are such cases during the pregnancy. Our study has a primary focus on the specific features of the pregnancy and delivery in patients with benign ovarian neoplasms.
Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study that included 88 pregnant patients with benign ovarian neoplasms that delivered in our facility during the period from 2014 to 2016. The patients were divided into two groups, the 1st group included 45 pregnant women with endometrioid ovarian cysts, the 2nd group consisted of 43 pregnant women with cystadenomas and ovarian teratomas. As a control group, we used cumulative statistical data from our facility and several related organizations, representing the general population.
Results: It was observed, that the odds ratio of the threatened miscarriage and the threat of preterm delivery was significantly higher in patients with endometrioid ovarian cysts compared to the general population. However, the frequency of complications of the preterm period and delivery in patients with cystadenomas and ovarian teratomas showed no significant difference, compared to populational data. There were no significant differences in complications between patients with endometrioid ovarian cysts and cystadenomas / ovarian teratomas.
Conclusion: Our research provides additional data on pregnancies with adnexal masses, which can help in the prevention of complications and choosing the modality of treatment in pregnant patients.
About the Authors
A. A. Kalashnik
M.V. Lomonosov State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kalashnik Anastasiya Alexandrovna – resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Basic Medicine
Lomonosovskii Avenue 1/1, Moscow, 119991
L. N. Shcherbakova
M.V. Lomonosov State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Shcherbakova Liya Niyazovna – PhDs in Medicine., Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Basic Medicine
Lomonosovskii Avenue 1/1, Moscow, 119991
M. V. Alexeenkova
M.V. Lomonosov State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexeenkova Mariya Vladimirovna - PhDs in Medicine, Assistant, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Basic Medicine
Lomonosovskii Avenue 1/1, Moscow, 119991
O. B. Panina
M.V. Lomonosov State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Panina Ol'ga Borisovna - Ph.D., Head of the Department, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Basic Medicine
Lomonosovskii Avenue 1/1, Moscow, 119991
References
1. Adamyan L.V., Popov A.A., Kozachenko A.V. Pregnancy and benign tumors of ovaries. Obstetrics and gynecology: news, opinions, training. 2015, V. 1, No. 4, pp. 58–62. (In Russian).
2. Oprescu N., Ionescu C., Dragan I. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: perinatal impact. Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology. 2018, Vol. 59, No. 1. pp. 153–158.
3. Goh W., Bohrer J., Zalud I. Management of the adnexal mass in pregnancy. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014, V. 26, No. 2, pp. 49-53.
4. Psaroudakis D., Hirsch M., Davis C. Review of the management of ovarian endometriosis. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 266–274.
5. Muzii L., Tucci C. Di, Feliciantonio M. Di et al. The effect of surgery for endometrioma on ovarian reserve evaluated by antral follicle count: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction. 2014, Vol. 29, No. 10, pp. 2190–2198.
6. Lalani S., Choudhry A.J., Firth B. et al. Endometriosis and adverse maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction. 2018, Vol. 33, No. 10, pp. 1854–1865.
7. Donnez J. Women with endometrioma-related infertility face a dilemma when choosing the appropriate therapy: surgery or in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility. 2018, Vol. 110, No. 7, pp. 1216–1217.
8. Gerasimova A.A., Shvyrev S.L., Shevchenko Yu.V. et al. Ultrasaund Criterias of Benign Ovarian Tumors during the Pregnancy. Bulletin of Russian State Medical University. 2013, V. 1, No. 1, pp. 35–40. (In Russian).
9. Gasparyan S. A., Ionova R.M. Popova O.S. et al. Endometriosis annd fertility. Key moment of treatment. Obstetrics, gynecology and reproduction. 2015, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 66–72. (In Russian).
10. Bugerenko K.A., Larin K.V., Shcherbakova L.N., Bugerenko A.Ye. et al. Causes of ovarian reserve reduction in endometrioid ovarian cysts. Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology. 2018, Т. 17, No. 4, pp. 25–30. (In Russian).
11. Donnez J., Binda M.M., Donnez O., Dolmans M.-M. Oxidative stress in the pelvic cavity and its role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Fertility and Sterility. 2016, Vol. 106, No. 5, pp. 1011–1017.
12. Koo Y.-J., Kim T.-J., Lee J.-E. Risk of torsion and malignancy by adnexal mass size in pregnant women. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2011, Vol. 90, No. 4, pp. 358–361.
13. Yen C.-F., Lin S.-L., Murk W. et al. Risk analysis of torsion and malignancy for adnexal masses during pregnancy. Fertility and Sterility. 2009, Vol. 91, No. 5, pp. 1895–1902.
14. Naqvi M., Kaimal A. Adnexal Masses in Pregnancy. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 93–101.
15. Dogan E., Okyay E., Saatli B. et al. Tuba ovarian abscesses formation from decidualized ovarian endometrioma after appendiceal endometriosis presenting as acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Iranian journal of reproductive medicine. 2012, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 275–8.
16. Ninia J.G. Large endometrioma with intrauterine pregnancy. New York state journal of medicine. 1992, Vol. 92, No. 8, pp. 364.
17. Somigliana E., Berlanda N., Benaglia L. et al. Surgical excision of endometriomas and ovarian reserve: a systematic review on serum antimüllerian hormone level modifications. Fertility and Sterility. 2012, Vol. 98, No. 6, pp. 1531–1538.
18. Ueda Y., Enomoto T., Miyatake T. et al. A retrospective analysis of ovarian endometriosis during pregnancy. Fertility and sterility. 2010, Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 78–84.
19. Maggiore U., Ferrero S., Mangili G. et al. A systematic review on endometriosis during pregnancy: diagnosis, misdiagnosis, complications and outcomes. Human Reproduction Update. 2016, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 70–103.
20. Laschke M.W., Menger M.D. Basic mechanisms of vascularization in endometriosis and their clinical implications. Human Reproduction Update. 2018, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 207–224.
21. Brosens I.A., Sutter P. De, Hamerlynck T. et al. Endometriosis is associated with a decreased risk of pre-eclampsia. Human Reproduction. 2007, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 1725–1729.
22. Chen I., Lalani S., Xie R. et al. Association between surgically diagnosed endometriosis and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Fertility and Sterility. 2018, Vol. 109, No. 1, pp. 142–147.
23. Glanc P., Salem S., Farine D. Adnexal Masses in the Pregnant Patient. Ultrasound Quarterly. 2008, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 225–240.
24. Conti N., Cevenini G., Vannuccini S. et al. Women with endometriosis at first pregnancy have an increased risk of adverse obstetric outcome. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2015, Vol. 28, No.15, pp. 1795–1798.
25. Stern J.E., Luke B., Tobias M. et al. Adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes associated with underlying diagnosis with and without assisted reproductive technology treatment. Fertility and sterility. 2015, Vol. 103, No. 6, pp. 1438–45.
26. Katz L., Levy A., Wiznitzer A., Sheiner E. Pregnancy outcome of patients with dermoid and other benign ovarian cysts. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2010, Vol. 281, No. 5, pp. 811–815.
Review
For citations:
Kalashnik A.A., Shcherbakova L.N., Alexeenkova M.V., Panina O.B. THE FEATURES OF PRETERM PERIOD AND DELIVERY IN PPATIENTS WITH BENIGN OVARIAN NEOPLASMS. Surgical practice (Russia). 2020;(1):64-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38181/2223-2427-2020-1-64-71
Views:
1100
Email this article 